Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 869.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel XL's global score of 81.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel XL's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and much less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video and a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.