Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Google Pixel is a incredibly older and noticeably thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Google made it incredibly lighter anyway. The Google Pixel features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less cores (although they are faster) and 12 GB less RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a lot better video quality, a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a back facing camera with a way better 50 MP resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 106% bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.