Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 440 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Honor 50 Pro, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 77. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Honor 50 Pro, it's much thinner and also notably newer. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels amount in each display inch, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a larger display. Honor 50 Pro features a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a lot worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.