Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than the Honor 50 Pro's global score of 77. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is a bit lighter than the Honor 50 Pro, but it's thicker and was released many years before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid screen than Honor 50 Pro, although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
The Honor 50 Pro and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 count with incredibly similar battery performance. Honor 50 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.