Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Honor 50, getting a score of 85.5 against 74.5. Despite being the best device in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also much older, thicker and just a little heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better processing power than Honor 50. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit sharper display than Honor 50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The Honor 50 takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.9 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Honor 50, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Honor 50 has just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.