Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 390 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than Honor 9X Pro's score of 71.9. HTC U Ultra is an extremely older device than Honor 9X Pro, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. HTC U Ultra features a bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Honor 9X Pro has a better storage for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Honor 9X Pro has a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Honor 9X Pro has a better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same aperture, the Honor 9X Pro also has a larger camera sensor, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution. The Honor 9X Pro has superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.