Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is way better than Honor 9X Pro, having a general score of 90.7 against 71.9. The Galaxy A52 construction is newer, just a little lighter and a little thinner than the Honor 9X Pro. Galaxy A52 features a processor that is just as good as Honor 9X Pro's CPU, both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit better looking display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little higher screen pixels density. Galaxy A52 captures clearer photographs and videos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Honor 9X Pro has more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy A52 has a little longer battery life than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.