Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 390 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than Honor 9X Pro, having a general score of 87.7 against 71.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Even being the best phone in this review, Galaxy M51's body is just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Honor 9X Pro.
Galaxy M51 features a screen that is just as good as the Honor 9X Pro one, because although the Galaxy M51 has a bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a CPU that is just as good as the Honor 9X Pro one, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy M51 takes slightly better photos and videos than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy M51 also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality. The Honor 9X Pro features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Honor 9X Pro also has more internal memory.
The Galaxy M51 has a very superior battery lifetime than Honor 9X Pro, because it has a 75 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.