Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-17 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is way better than Honor 9X Pro, getting a general score of 89 against 71.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 and Honor 9X Pro were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior CPU than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note10 has a slightly better display than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density. Honor 9X Pro features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the Honor 9X Pro also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor 9X Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity. The Honor 9X Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.