Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than Honor 9X Pro's 71.9 overall score. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Honor 9X Pro has Android 10, so it offers some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note3's body is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than Honor 9X Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before.
The Honor 9X Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Honor 9X Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (but slower).
The Honor 9X Pro captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Honor 9X Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates, a much more MP back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Honor 9X Pro features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Honor 9X Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.