Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-17 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.42 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Midnight black and Phantom purple | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A76, Arm Cortex-A55 and DynamIQ, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Honor 9X Pro, with a global score of 94.6 against 71.9. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is heavier but incredibly thinner than the Honor 9X Pro, and both were released with only 5 months difference. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Honor 9X Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better performance than Honor 9X Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Honor 9X Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The Honor 9X Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage, the Honor 9X Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Honor 9X Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Honor 9X Pro also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Honor 9X Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.