Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is better than HTC 10's overall score of 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy M31s construction is much newer than HTC 10's, although it's a bit thicker and a lot heavier. HTC 10 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Galaxy M31s has more storage to store more games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a little better processing power than HTC 10, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy M31s takes better photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs.
The Galaxy M31s has a superior battery life than HTC 10, because it has a 100% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.