Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is a lot better than HTC Desire 10 pro's global score of 74.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is notably newer than the HTC Desire 10 pro, it's just a little thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while HTC Desire 10 pro counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little faster CPU than HTC Desire 10 pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better looking display than HTC Desire 10 pro, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The HTC Desire 10 pro has just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A90 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC Desire 10 pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.