Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.19 x 2.61 x 0.40 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 34.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than HTC Desire 300, getting an 83.7 score against 53.7. Both of these devices have Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while HTC Desire 300 has Android 4.1.2 version. LG V50 ThinQ is a thinner but incredibly heavier device than HTC Desire 300. LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater processing power than HTC Desire 300, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better screen than HTC Desire 300, because it has a much bigger screen, a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher pixel number per display inch. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC Desire 300, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ captures much better photos and videos than HTC Desire 300, because it has a much larger aperture for better captures in low light environments and a camera in the back with lot more MP. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than HTC Desire 300, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1650mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the HTC Desire 300.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.