Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.1.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.04 x 2.63 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 384 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than the HTC Desire 400's 55.1 global score. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a little bit thinner but much heavier than the HTC Desire 400. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while HTC Desire 400 has Android 4.1.1.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior processor than HTC Desire 400, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ features an incredibly better looking screen than HTC Desire 400, because it has a really larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and way more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ features much more storage for apps and games than HTC Desire 400, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than HTC Desire 400, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 1800mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ takes greater pictures and videos than HTC Desire 400, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a back camera with a much better resolution, a way bigger aperture and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.