Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.5 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 | Android 5.1 |
| 2013-02-19 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.41 x 2.69 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 149.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 469 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 768 x 432 (96 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 408 hours standby time 16.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a little bit better than HTC One, with a overall score of 74.8 against 70.5. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 design is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than the HTC One's, but it is heavier. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a more recent 5.1 version and HTC One has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One features a little bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more processing cores (but slower) and a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit better looking display than HTC One, because it has a better resolution of 2560 x 1440, a just a bit better count of pixels per inch of screen and a bit larger screen.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures much better photos and videos than HTC One, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way better 21 megapixels resolution camera. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One, because it has a 3760mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.