Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the HTC One M8s, having a global score of 83.7 against 66.5. LG V50 ThinQ is a thinner but somewhat heavier device than the HTC One M8s. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version and HTC One M8s has Android 5.0.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior processing power than HTC One M8s, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The HTC One M8s counts with a bit sharper display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a much smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a bit worse display density.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots way better photographs and videos than HTC One M8s, because although it has a back camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M8s, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 112 GB more internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better battery duration than HTC One M8s, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.