Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (120 fps) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9.3 PureView is better than HTC One ME, getting an 84.2 score against 73.5. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 9.3 PureView has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, giving you a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Nokia 9.3 PureView is a noticeably thinner and extremely lighter phone than the HTC One ME.
HTC One ME has a sharper display than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because although it has a little worse 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixels density. Nokia 9.3 PureView has a greater hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia 9.3 PureView shoots greater videos and photos than HTC One ME, because it has a lot more megapixels back camera, a much larger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations and a much better video definition.
The HTC One ME has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Nokia 9.3 PureView, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 2 TB. Nokia 9.3 PureView has a way better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.