Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than the HTC U Play, getting a overall score of 83.7 against 73.5. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is noticeably newer than HTC U Play, it's a bit thicker and much heavier. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater display density.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory to store more apps and games than HTC U Play, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot better video quality. The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.