Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2018-01-17 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is much better than the HTC U11 EYEs's 76.9 general score. IPhone 8's design is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than the HTC U11 EYEs, although both of them were only released 4 months apart. The iPhone 8 has a little bit better screen than HTC U11 EYEs, although it has a way smaller display, a just a little worse display pixel density and a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution.
HTC U11 EYEs counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone 8 counts with a greater hardware performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has less cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The HTC U11 EYEs features a really longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 3930mAh battery capacity against 1821mAh. IPhone 8 has just a bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back camera, the iPhone 8 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.