Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-08-30 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the HTC U12 Life, with an 85.5 score against 74.4. Even being the best device we compare here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an a bit thicker and just a little heavier device than HTC U12 Life. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better performance than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little more vivid display than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same quantity of pixels per inch of screen, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2246 resolution and a bit larger display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photos.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U12 Life, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little bit longer battery life than HTC U12 Life, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.