Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 5.74 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 10.41 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Crystal Blue, Crystal Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| $ 2785.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2480 x 2200 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 414 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 9000 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A77@3.13 GHz + 3 x Cortex-A77@2.54 GHz + 4 x Cortex-A55@2.05 GHz, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3130 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G78 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate X2 has a general score of 89.1, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Huawei Mate X2 has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Even being the best we are comparing here, Huawei Mate X2's body is a lot older, much heavier and thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than Huawei Mate X2. Both of them have an equal 2200 x 2480px resolution, the same number of pixels per screen inch and a display with the same size. Huawei Mate X2 counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Huawei Mate X2, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Huawei Mate X2, and although they both have a 50 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features superior battery duration than Huawei Mate X2, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Huawei Mate X2 costs a lot more money than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.