Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Apple |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-10-17 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.06 x 2.69 x 0.51 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.94 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.1 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 18.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is a lot better than Kyocera Torque XT, having an 85 score against 54.3. IPhone 8's body is way newer, noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Kyocera Torque XT. The iPhone 8 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Kyocera Torque XT, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores , a 64-bit processor and 1 GB more RAM.
IPhone 8 features a bit better screen than Kyocera Torque XT, because it has a way better 750 x 1334 resolution, a bigger display and a greater pixels amount in each screen inch. The iPhone 8 counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Kyocera Torque XT, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Kyocera Torque XT has a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 2500mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh. The iPhone 8 counts with a much better camera than Kyocera Torque XT, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way more megapixels camera.
IPhone 8 is a lot more expensive than Kyocera Torque XT, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.