Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is way better than the LG G Flex 2's global score of 75.2. The Galaxy A71 5G is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the LG G Flex 2, although it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
The LG G Flex 2 features a better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels density. LG G Flex 2 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits processor.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a way better battery duration than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G is a lot more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.