Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-01-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than LG G Flex 2, having an 81 score against 75.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro design is noticeably newer and thinner, but heavier than LG G Flex 2.
The LG G Flex 2 features a much better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a just a little greater screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
LG G Flex 2 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with greater battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit better camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a camera with a better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.