Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having an 81.2 score against 81. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has the older 14 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 is a somewhat heavier cellphone than LG G7 ThinQ, but both of them have the same thickness.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has much lower brightness and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG G7 ThinQ has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
LG G7 ThinQ features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.