Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-06-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having a overall score of 84.9 against 81. Galaxy A80's body is newer than LG G7 ThinQ's, although it's a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 23% larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has just a bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.