Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than the LG K51S, having a general score of 84.2 against 74.3. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is a bit thinner and lighter than the LG K51S, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit more than a year before. The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a CPU that's very similar to the processor in LG K51S, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a more vivid display than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher display pixel density and a much higher 1080 x 2220 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a much better camera than LG K51S, although it has a worse video resolution and a much less megapixels resolution back camera.
The LG K51S features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 2 TB. The LG K51S features longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.