Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than LG K52, getting a global score of 77.9 against 76. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a way older and much thicker phone than the LG K52, but Motorola was able to build it just a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version and LG K52 has Android 10, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit faster CPU than LG K52, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better display than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a way greater count of pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola DROID Turbo and LG K52 feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos and a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
LG K52 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K52 counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.