Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is way better than LG K52's 76 general score. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than LG K52, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10.
The Galaxy A71 5G features just a little better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G has a brighter display than LG K52, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a better screen density and a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a way better camera than LG K52, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K52, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a little longer battery life than LG K52, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.