Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-27 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Sky Blue and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than the LG K62's general score of 78.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than LG K62, although both were released with only a few months difference. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G features a much better display than LG K62, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a better pixels amount per display inch and a bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than LG K62, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a back camera with much more megapixels, a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality. The LG K62 counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better battery duration than LG K62, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.