Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-09-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a general score of 79.1, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. LG V30's design is newer and just a little lighter than Motorola Moto Z Force's, although it's also just a little bit thicker. The LG V30 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the LG V30 also has a greater number of faster cores.
The LG V30 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a bit higher pixel count per inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The Motorola Moto Z Force and LG V30 count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto Z Force's storage for applications and games is just as good as the LG V30 one, both of them have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory. The Moto Z Force counts with a little longer battery life than LG V30, because it has a 6 percent more battery size.
LG V30 costs more money than Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.