Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 global score. The LG V30 is an extremely older phone than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but LG made it way lighter and thinner. LG V30 has a really superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The LG V30 features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixels amount in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than LG V30, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a very superior battery life than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. Galaxy A15 5G shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a camera with lot more MP.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.