Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the LG V30, getting a global score of 90.8 against 79.1. The Galaxy A51 5G design is extremely newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V30. The LG V30 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixels count in each inch of display.
LG V30 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots better pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V30, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with better battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 36% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a bit more expensive than LG V30, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.