Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than LG V30's global score of 79.1. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably newer device than the LG V30, although it is way heavier and thicker. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper screen than LG V30, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bigger screen.
LG V30 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a CPU that's very similar to LG V30's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a way more megapixels camera and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V30. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V30, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.