Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting a overall score of 79.1 against 78.1. The LG V30 construction is a bit lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released many years before. LG V30 features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The LG V30 features a much better display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little bit larger screen, a lot more pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. LG V30 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the LG V30 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG V30 has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V30 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.