Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a 79.1 score against 78.3. LG V30's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo X70 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The LG V30 counts with a bit sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Vivo X70 Pro has better battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 4450mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.