Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 81.3 score against 76.4. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is extremely newer, a lot thinner and lighter than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse video definition and a lot worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.