Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Moto Z4's 79.8 score. LG V35 ThinQ is a a bit lighter phone than the Moto Z4, but both of them are 0.29inches thick. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better screen pixels density. The Motorola Moto Z4 captures better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a little longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 9% more battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.