Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 82.3 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a newer phone than LG V35 ThinQ, but it is a bit thicker and just a little heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Galaxy A60. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A60, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A60 has a little better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.