Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a general score of 84.2 against 81.3. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a just a bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A7 (2018). They have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a battery performance that's just as good as the LG V35 ThinQ one. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a camera with way less megapixels resolution and a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.