Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-08 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 261.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting a global score of 83.3 against 81.3. Galaxy M30s's design is newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a very superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has an 82 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.