Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| 2018-06-08 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 261.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, we must note that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in LG V35 ThinQ, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures slightly better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in low-light situations and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.