Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4, having an 81.2 score against 79.8. The LG V40 ThinQ is a just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than Motorola Moto Z4. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto Z4, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z4 counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 9% bigger battery size. Moto Z4 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto Z4 also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.