Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's general score of 79.9. LG V40 ThinQ's design is a little thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ and the OPPO Find X3 Pro feature similar displays, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a little larger screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.