Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A12, with an 81.2 score against 80.3. Despite of the fact that LG V40 ThinQ is way older than Galaxy A12, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 OS, so both should count with very similar OS features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ features a lot better display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a lot higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A12's camera is just as good as LG V40 ThinQ's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much smaller diafragm aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A12, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A12 has a way better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.