Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 82.3 against 81.2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A60 has a newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features and improved performance. Galaxy A60's design is just a bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than the LG V40 ThinQ, and both of them were released with only 8 months difference.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A60. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a quite bigger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.