Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. The Galaxy M30s body is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M30s has 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, counting with some additional features and enhanced performance.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixel density. The LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a way better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 82 percent more battery size.
Galaxy M30s features a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.