Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than the LG V40 ThinQ. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a little larger screen and a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. LG V40 ThinQ and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 both feature very similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has improved battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a camera that's just as good as the LG V40 ThinQ one, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.