Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, having an 83.7 score against 78.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. LG V50 ThinQ is a older and a little bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X70 Pro, but LG managed to make it a bit lighter anyway.
Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better processing unit than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
Vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Vivo X70 Pro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.